123Notary
Enter Zip, City, or County... i.e. orange,NY or 90019
Search Method:    regular time edocs
Mobile Notary / Signing Agent Discussion ForumDear Signing Agents,
You need to REGISTER and have a password to post or reply to discussion topics. Please remember, your password for your listing on 123notary.com is NOT RELATED to and is different from your password on the forum. Your password on the forum can be whatever you want it to be.
Lookup a specific signing company, word, or phrase
Mobile Notary / Signing Agent Discussion Forum
Register | String Format | Index Format | Active Topics | Hot Topics | Preview Topics | Advanced Search | Members | Profile | Tutorial | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 The 123notary.com Forum for Signing Agents
 Legal Issues
 Perjury in California
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
1 -1  Be the first person to vote!
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

edelske

New York
815 Posts

Posted - 03/18/2008 :  6:00:41 PM  Show Profile  Visit edelske's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I have seen and processed several of these new form CA Acks. I'm glad they are shipped to CA and not processed in NYC. The County Clerk's office will not authenticate my signature (as in processing an Apostille) if I use the word "certify" or "certification" in the notary section. They ONLY allow those words to be used by a public official when issuing documents. It is not a "law" - but if either of those words are used "by the notary" - they will not authenticate and consider it an "improper" wording. Not at all a problem for me as the typical "CA format" docs never go to my local county clerk. I do change it to "under the laws of New York" - not knowing the CA laws and not wanting to be subject to them. So far - no complaints about that minor change. Time will tell. Thus another example of a notary form/format that is similar to the Pinellas "blue ink" issue; what is OK at point of processing may not be OK at point of use; and, of course the reverse is true. Somebody should write a "notary's prayer" - it truly takes divine intervention to avoid getting somebody mad these days as we try to serve the public - and stay out of the courtroom.
ken
Go to Top of Page

jbelmont

California
3106 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2008 :  2:45:41 PM  Show Profile  Visit jbelmont's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Regardless of interpretation, it looks like CA is getting to be more intelligent about notary laws. That is a good thing.
Go to Top of Page

LindaH

Florida
1754 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2008 :  02:48:59 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I read it a bit different, Jeremy....the new CA certificate, in addition to requiring personal appearance (and eliminating "personally known") provides for an additional sentence at the end of the certificate to be signed by the Notary, "I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.."

The foregoing paragraph referred to is the actual cert itself, containing date, name of person and personally appeared -IMO the notary isn't attesting to the truth of the contents of the document -this certification under penalty of perjury is affirming that the signer is so-and-so, PERSONALLY APPEARED and appeared ON THAT DATE AND AT THAT PLACE....basically attesting to the truth of the information in the cert....

Sounds to me like CA is addressing the issue of notarizations without personal appearance, backdating, etc., and that's a good thing. I, personally, always require ID, even from my next door neighbors, who've asked me to waive the ID requirement, saying "you know me"...maybe so, but it's my personal practice...I require ID.

JMHO

Linda
www.notarydepot.com/notary/lindah
http://www.notary.net/websites/LindaHubbell
Go to Top of Page

jbelmont

California
3106 Posts

Posted - 02/04/2008 :  7:23:27 PM  Show Profile  Visit jbelmont's Homepage  Reply with Quote
California has a new law regarding perjury. The certificate of acknowledgment is now executed under the penalty of perjury. According to civil code 1189, a notary who willfully states as true any material fact known to be false is subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000. This law could apply to all notarizations.

What are your feelings about this law. You don't have to be from California to have an opinion on this matter.
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:


Mobile Notary / Signing Agent Discussion Forum © 123notary.com Go To Top Of Page

Tips for using the forum
The most important feature on the forum is the search box. You can look up a particular word, phrase, name of a company, and see a potentially large list of search results with which you can obtain data. Filters are also valuable. If you want to find popular posts, you can use the number of views filter. You can also see whats new with the active topics link. Email us at info@123notary.com if you need any help using the notary forum.

Resources
The notary public resource page is valuable as it has links to all of the free information pages for notaries. Pages linked to the resource page include a page that teaches you everything you need to know to get the most out of your listing. Another page teaches you all the secrets of getting paid. There is a link to our free list of signing companies. There is also a glossary, learning tools, and much more. If you are a notary, the free tips we give are invaluable.

Popular pages
If you visit 123notary.com often, you might want to visit some of our most popular pages such as the California notary, Texas notary, Florida notary, and New York notary pages to browse the site. We also have valuable pages for notaries such as the free list of signing companies, and the resource page. Please also visit our get notarized and notarized letter page.